OnBrief

Google Auditorial

Google

Ninety-seven percent of the world's top websites exclude blind and low vision users by design — not by malice, but by omission. Google, The Guardian, and the Royal National Institute of Blind People responded not with a campaign, but with a counterexample: Auditorial, a storytelling platform built around 22 adaptive features that let readers experience the same story in over 100 different ways — through customizable reading, listening, and watching modes calibrated to individual need. The strategic intelligence here is the format: rather than publishing an accessibility report or running an awareness campaign, they built proof of concept. Auditorial becomes the argument. For any publisher who sees it and thinks 'we should do this,' the Accessibility Notebook hands over the blueprint. That's product-as-media-as-advocacy operating simultaneously. What separates this from corporate social responsibility theater is that the output is genuinely useful — 96% of testers said it vastly improved their experience, and 100,000+ readers have engaged with the platform. The lesson for the industry isn't about accessibility compliance; it's about what happens when inclusion is treated as a creative constraint rather than a legal checkbox. The most ambitious design often emerges from the tightest restrictions, and Auditorial makes that case more eloquently than any print ad could.

97%

Website accessibility issues in top million sites

300 million

Blind and low vision population affected

22

Adaptive features in system

100+

Different ways to experience same story

100,000+

Readers reached

96%

Testers who said Auditorial vastly improved their experience

Sources

Related Campaigns

Campaign descriptions are original editorial content. OnBrief is not affiliated with the brands or agencies featured. Takedown policy